CDF has recently released two different analyses of its search forsingle Tquark events:
My explanation for the apparent discrepancy is based on amodel of the Tquark - Higgs - Vacuum system in which the T-quark isregarded, not as a simple quark with mass about 175 GeV, but as asystem in which the Tquark has three mass states:
CDF and D0 observed 3 peaks in their T-quark data (see FERMILAB-PUB-94/097-E from CDF and hep-ex/9703008 from D0):
The middle (cyan) peak ( around 175 GeV ) is the one they initially identified as the T-quark.
The low peak (green) around 130-150 Ge V and the high peak (magenta) around 225 GeV can be understood in terms of Froggatt's paper hep-ph/0307138 in terms of a 3-part system of the T-quark, the Higgs, and the Triviality Bound, with a high-energy cut-off that goes all the way to the Planck energy 10^19 GeV (the graph below also shows curves for cut-offs at 10^16 and 10^10 GeV and it can be seen that a GUT-level cut-off around 10^16 GeV gives similar results).
For one example of the high and low peaks, look at the D0 event Run 84395, Event 15530 ( mu mu ) described in the 1997 UC Berkeley PhD thesis of Erich Ward Varnes and in hep-ex/9808029
analyzed using the matrix-element weighting algorithm that, according to hep-ex/9808029, "... is an extension of the weight proposed in [R.H. Dalitz and G.R. Goldstein, Phys. Rev. D45, 1531 (1992)] ...". Further examples of events related to the three peakcan be found at http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/TQ3mHFII1vNFadd97.pdf
Further details can be found in:
- the paper by Koichi Yamawaki at hep-ph/9603293 describing Tquark condensate Higgs models ( NJL and BHL ) that seem to be related to the low and high T-quark peaks; and
- the paper by Michio Hashimoto, Masaharu Tanabashi, and Koichi Yamawaki at hep-ph/0311165 describing a Tquark condensate models in 8-dimensional spacetime ( with 4 compact dimensions ) that seem to be related to the middle T-quark peak.
In that 3-peak model:
so it is natural that
the LF method which only looks at events near Tquark mass 175 GeVwould miss single-Tquark events, while
the ME method would see single-Tquark events, which would be seenat Tquark mass below 150 GeV.
Tommaso Dorigo in his Nobember 2006 blog entry athttp://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/the-elusive-single-top/ said,about search for single-Tquark events at CDF by the LikelihoodFunction (LF) method:
"... CDF has recently blessed two new results on the search for the process called "single top production" ... All searches for the elusive single top quark production have been [u]nsuccessful so far. ... We thought that one inverse femtobarn of available CDF data would do the trick. ... Not yet.
In a careful analysis of "W+2jet events" ... ones containing a lepton, missing energy originated by a neutrino, and two jets, at least one of which originated from b-quark hadronization, CDF can not measure the production of single top yet, and actually is in the awkward position of excluding its production according to the predictions of the Standard Model. ...
Nobody really believes that single top production is not there: it must be. It probably is just a unlucky downward fluctuation of our data. But still, it starts to be embarassing! Here you can see a plot of the event likelihood, constructed with all available kinematic information, for the set of events where the search has been conducted.
... the single top production processes (actually mostly the t-channel one in this particular plot ...) should contribute sizeably (green and blue histograms), but they do not, and in fact we observe a deficit of events with respect to all concurrent background processes.
... the most probable value of the cross section for single top production via "s-channel" and "t-channel" processes (two different mechanisms that should both yield a single top signal, which have been searched independently in the data) is very close to zero,
and that the standard model prediction (the red point on the right) is actually excluded! ...".
In a comment to the Tommaso Dorigo blog entry mentioned above,Andrea Giammanco said:
"... Thanks to the CDF analysis webpages (discussed in this site a few days ago) I see that there is an inconsistency between this result and one, yet to be pubished, with a competing method:
That's thrilling! ...".
The description of the "competing method" of Matrix-Element (ME)analysis in the paper "Search for Electroweak Single Top QuarkProduction using the Matrix Element Method with L=955 pb-1" byFlorencia Canelli (FNAL), Peter Dong (UCLA), Bernd Stelzer (UCLA),and Rainer Wallny (UCLA) that is at athttp://www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/new/top/2006/SingleTop/ME_1FB/index.htmlsaid:
"... We performed the first search for single top using a Matrix-Element based analysis. We apply our method to 955 pb-1 of data taken by the CDF experiment. We include rate and shape systematic uncertainties in our method. We measure a single top cross-section &sigmasingle top =2.7+1.5-1.3pb. ...
More cross-checks ... We look at variables which are sensitive to single top production. As we make increasing cuts on our event probability discriminant (EPD), we can observe the increasing sensitivity of these variables and the behavior of the data. ...
Increasing cuts on the EPD for the invariant mass of the lepton, neutrino, and b-jet.
Increasing cuts on the EPD for the invariant mass of the lepton, neutrino, and leading jet.
Increasing cuts on the EPD for the invariant mass of the lepton, neutrino, and second jet. ...".
It seems to me that the invariant mass cross-check data shownabove indicate that much of the excess of events over background isin the bin for 0 to 150 GeV.
The main deviations that I see from that seem to be in thethird and fourth histograms for "leading jets" (in which many excessevents seem to be in the 200 to 250 GeV bin) and in the secondhistogram for "second jet" in which there is not much excess at all,just a little in the 150 to 200 GeV bin.
So, overall, it seems to me that the ME method does in fact seesingle-Tquark events, but that they are mostly seen in events withTquark mass below 150 GeV.
Tommaso Dorigo, in a 19 November 2006 e-mail message to me,said:
indeed, part of the excess in the matrix element analysis is at low invariant mass... Some of the KS probabilities are smallish, although of course many variables are tested and if one plays the game of going for the fluke in one out of many distributions one is sure to find it.
In your case though, you have a reason for looking specifically for those one or two distributions (low three-object masses) and I agree that you score a point there.
As for the other analysis, the likelihood of course selects "top-like" stuff, intended at 172 GeV of mass or so, and so a top quark with low mass would not contribute to the signal region too much.
Therefore yes, I agree that as far as present data is concerned, a single top quark of mass below 150 GeV could still be present in our data without us realizing it with the used means.
I think one more year -two times the data we have analyzed so far- will give you a more clear answer. If you have theoretical input to submit to our experimenters working at new physics searches, I suggest you talk to our exotics physics conveners (their e-mail is in the web page of exotics analyses).
I expect to send an e-mail message to the exotics physicsconveners as suggested by Tommaso Dorigo.